PHYSIOCHEMICAL AND MICROBIAL OF PACKAGED WATER ANALYSIS SOLD IN OSUN STATE.
INTRODUCTION
Water
is an essential natural resource required by all living organisms. However
among these living organisms, human beings tend to use water most for the
purposes of drinking, personal, domestic, industrial and recreational uses
(Igbeneghu and Lamikanra 2014). Nigeria like other developing nations is faced
with problems of potable water supply for its estimated 160 million citizens
(Adesiji 2013). As a result of this and other factors, packaged drinking water
has been used as alternative drinking water source (Oyedeji et al. 2010).
Packaged drinking water is defined as water packaged in cans, plastic sachets
and pouches for the main purpose of consumption (Warburton 1993). It is mostly
common in low socio economic countries has means of salvaging scarce potable,
safe water and to generate income, yet, various studies have shown that some
packaged drinking water may not be safe for drinking due to presence of
pathogens (Ahmed et al. 2013; Obiri-Danso et al. 2003).
According
to Oyedeji et al. (2010), water borne diseases are one of the major public
health related problems in developing countries like Nigeria. The ever
increasing demand, sale and indiscriminate consumption of packaged drinking
water in Nigeria, therefore, poses significant public health risks to the citizens
especially individuals with compromised immune systems (Mgbakor et al. 2011).
Most producers of packaged drinking water in Nigeria obtain their raw water
mostly from sources such as local, municipal piped water or well water and
therefore, do not follow specified standards due to lack of the appropriate
drinking water technology (Oluyege et al. 2014).
Osun
State Water Corporation (OSWC), and the Rural
Water Environmental Sanitation Agency (RUWESA)
are inadequate for the growing population and
at best epileptic in most Osogbo communities (OSWC,
2008). As a consequence of pipe borne water
shortage, the Osun State residents depend on
water from boreholes, hand-dug wells and water
vended in sachets. From a public health perspective,
there is a need to ascertain the
quality of water accessible to the residents to
avoid or reduce incidence of contaminated
water-related health hazards. Based on this,
the study was undertaken to assess the
physical, chemical, and bacteriological properties of of packaged
water used by the students residents of Osun
State. The study is relevant in assuring
whether the quality of the packaged water meet the
regulatory standards because portable water is essential to life.
1.2
Problem Statement.
Despite
various studies by researchers, there is no information on prevailing
pathogens. This study was, therefore, carried out to compile nationally and
internationally published articles in order to summarize and compare occurrence
of fecal indicator bacteria and potential water borne bacterial pathogens in
packaged drinking water sold in Osun state.
So also
analyse the physiochemical properties of the packaged water to check if they
conform with the standard to ensure their safety.
1.3
Objectives of the Study
The
major objective of the study is the physiochemical and
microbial analysis of water sold in Osun State.
1.4
Research Questions
(1)
what are the various packaged water sold in Osun state?
(2) Is
there any physical proof to show they are portable water?
1.5
Significance of the study
This
study gives a clear insight into the physiochemical and
microbial analysis of water sold in Osun state. The findings
and recommendations of these research will enlighten consumers on how safe the
water samples are and may also help the concerned regulatory bodies on the
safety of the water sold in Osun state.
1.6
Scope of the study
This
research focuses on the physiochemical and
microbial analysis of packaged water sold in Osun state.
1.7
Limitations of the study
This
study was conducted on selected samples of water sold in Osun State.
References
Adesiji
AR. Microbiological quality of packaged drinking water brands marketed in Minna
metropolis, North Central Nigeria. Nig J Technolog Res. 2013;7(1):1–7.
Ahmed
W, Yusuf R, Hasan I, Ashraf W, Goonetilleke A, Toze S, Gardner T. Fecal
indicators and bacterial pathogens in bottled water from Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Braz J Microbiol. 2013;44(1):97–103. doi: 10.1590/S1517-83822013005000026. [PMC
free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
Igbeneghu
OA, Lamikanra A. The bacteriological quality of different brands of bottled
water available to consumers in Ile-Ife, south-western Nigeria. BMC Res Notes.
2014;7(1):859. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-7-859. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross
Ref]
Korzeniewska
E, Filipkowska Z, Zarnoch D, Tworus K. Survival of Escherichia coli and
Aeromonas hydrophila in non-carbonated mineral water. Polish J Microbiol.
2005;54:35–40. [PubMed]
Mgbakor
C, Ojiegbe G, Okonko IO, Odu NN, Alli JA, Nwanze JC, Onoh CC. Bacteriological
evaluation of some sachet water on sales in Owerri metropolis, Imo State.
Nigeria Mal J Microbiol. 2011;7(4):217–225.
NIS .
Nigerian standard for drinking water quality. Microbiological limits. Abuja:
Standard Organization of Nigeria; 2007.
Obiri-Danso
K, Okore-Hanson A, Jones K. The microbiological quality of drinking water sold
on the streets in Kumasi. Ghana Lett Appl Microbiol. 2003;37(4):334–339. doi:
10.1046/j.1472-765X.2003.01403.x. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
Oluyege
J, Olowomofe T, Abiodun O. Microbial contamination of packaged drinking water
in Ado-Ekiti metropolis, south western Nigeria. Am J Res Com.
2014;2(10):231–246.
Oyedeji
O, Olutiola P, Moninuola M. Microbiological quality of packaged drinking water
brands marketed in Ibadan metropolis and Ile-Ife city in South Western Nigeria.
Afr J Micro Res. 2010;4(1):096–102.
Venkatesan
KD, Balaji M, Victor K. Microbiological analysis of packaged drinking water
sold in Chennai. Int J Med Sci Public Health. 2014;3(4):472–476. doi: 10.5455/ijmsph.2014.150220143.
[Cross Ref]
Warburton
DW. A review of the microbiological quality of bottled water sold in Canada.
Part 2. The need for more stringent standards and regulations. Can J Microbiol.
1993;39(2):158–168. doi: 10.1139/m93-022. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
Comments
Post a Comment