IMPACT OF IFRS DISCLOSURES ON ORGANIZATIONAL PERFORMANCE
IMPACT OF IFRS DISCLOSURES ON ORGANIZATIONAL PERFORMANCE
As the business world becomes closer in
its financial and trade ties, many countries are moving towards International
Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS), common accounting rules that define how
transactions should be reported and what information should be disclosed in
financial statements (IASB, 2007). This unitary set of standards has solved
many problems while creating others. However, this study is examining the
impact of IFRS disclosures on the organizational performance.
It is important to look
at the big picture and the overarching aim of IFRS. In an increasingly global
market place, international comparability is critical to enable the effective
allocation of scarce resources. To achieve international comparability the key
nations around the world need to commit to one global set of accounting standards.
While over 100 countries have already adopted IFRS, key countries like the
United States, Japan and India are yet to require IFRS for listed companies
(Bradshaw et al, 2012).
It is important to note that
companies that use the same standards to prepare their financial statements can
be compared to each other more accurately. This is especially important when
comparing companies located in different countries, as they might otherwise be
using different rules and methodologies to prepare their statements. This
increase in comparability has helped investors better determine where their
investment dollars should go thereby enhancing organizational performance as
there will be more investors to invest in the company. Though, the United
States has not yet adopted International Financial Reporting Standards and
other countries continue to hold out as well (Bradshaw et al, 2012). This makes
accounting by foreign-based companies that do business in America difficult as
they often have to prepare financial statements
using IFRS and another set using American Generally Accepted Accounting
Principles (Bradshaw et al, 2012).
IFRS disclosures use a
principles-based, rather than rules-based, philosophy. A principles-based
philosophy means that the goal of each standard is to arrive at a reasonable
valuation and that there are many ways to get there. This gives companies the
freedom to adapt IFRS disclosures to their particular situation, which leads to
more easily read and useful statements. There is a downside to the flexibility
that IFRS disclosure allows organizations to utilize only the methods they wish
to, allowing the financial statements to show only desired results. This can
lead to revenue or profit manipulation, can be used to hide financial problems
in the company and can even encourage fraud. For example, changing the method
of inventory valuation can bring more income into the current year's profit and
loss statement, making the company appear more profitable than it really is.
While IFRS requires that changes to the application of the rules must be
justifiable, it is often possible for companies to "invent" reasons
for making the changes. Stricter rules would ensure that all companies are
valuing their statements the same way.
EDITOR SOURCE: Impact Of IFRS Disclosures On Organizational Performance
Comments
Post a Comment